法律教育網

法律英語

2019瑞達法考客觀題學習包

考試內容 報名條件 報名時間 報名方法

成績查詢 考試時間 分 數 線 授予資格

您的位置:法律教育網 > 法律英語 > 經典案例 > 正文

醫療協助自殺(physician assisted suicide)

2016-02-15 11:42  來源:   糾錯

What is Physician-Assisted Suicide?

In any discussion of physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia, it is important that the terminology is clear Although they may have similar goals, physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia differ in whether or not the physician participates in the action that finally ends life:

In Physician-assisted suicide:

The physician provides the necessary means or information The patient performs the act

In Euthanasia: The physician performs the intervention Euthanasia is defined as “the act of bringing about the death of a hopelessly ill and suffering person in a relatively quick and painless way for reasons of mercy” (Back et al)

^top

Important Facts about Physician-Assisted Suicide

Physician-Assisted Suicide is not a new phenomenon Suffering has always been a part of human existence. Requests to end suffering by means of death through both physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia have occurred since the beginning of medicine Most physicians receive a request Based on a recent study, 57% of physicians practicing today have received a request for physician-assisted suicide in some form or another (Back et al)

Many alternatives to Physician-Assisted Suicide exist While unrelieved physical suffering may have been greater in the past, modern medicine now has more knowledge and skills to relieve suffering than ever before

Today, specialists in palliative care believe that if all patients had access to careful assessment and optimal symptom control and supportive care, the suffering of most patients with life-threatening illnesses could be reduced sufficiently to eliminate their desire for hastened death

Even when the desire persists, avenues other than physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia are available to remedy suffering and avoid prolonging life against the patient‘s wish ^top

The Legal and Ethical Debate around Physician-Assisted Suicide

The debate about the legalization of active steps to intentionally end life as a means to end suffering remains controversial Modern history suggests that the topic comes up for intense attention periodically Because of the added risk of misunderstanding or overriding the patient‘s wishes, there is currently less support for euthanasia than for physician-assisted suicide. Nonetheless, both requests do occur and physicians need to know how to respond to either type of request As the current debate unfolds, there are 2 principles on which all of organized medicine agrees:

Physicians have an obligation to relieve pain and suffering and to promote the dignity of dying patients in their care

The principle of patient bodily integrity requires that physicians must respect patients‘ competent decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment An important event in the present debate occurred in 1997, when the US Supreme Court:

Recognized no federal constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide

Affirmed that state legislatures may choose to legalize it As of early 1999, Oregon is the only state that has voted to legalize PAS In contrast to the PAS debate, the right to palliative care is uniformly acknowledged. The same US Supreme Court Justices‘ concurring opinions supported the right of all Americans to receive quality palliative care ^top

Objectives of this Module

The objectives of this module are to:

Define physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and euthanasia Describe their current status in the law Identify root causes of suffering that prompt requests Understand a 6–step protocol for responding to requests Be able to meet most patients‘ needs This module presents an approach for responding to patient requests regarding physician-assisted suicide, both compassionately and competently

The focus is not on the debate to legalize PAS or euthanasia, but rather on the practical steps that a physician can take to assess the patient‘s request, address the root causes of the request, and ensure that the best quality of end-of-life care is practiced

責任編輯:儀

特別推薦

地圖
法律教育網官方微信

法律教育網微信公眾號向您推薦考試資訊、輔導資料、考試教材、歷年真題、法律常識、法律法規等資訊,只有你想不到,沒有我們做不到!詳情>>

1、凡本網注明“來源:法律教育網”的所有作品,版權均屬法律教育網所有,未經本網授權不得轉載、鏈接、轉貼或以其他方式使用;已經本網授權的,應在授權范圍內使用,且必須注明“來源:法律教育網”。違反上述聲明者,本網將追究其法律責任。

2、本網部分資料為網上搜集轉載,均盡力標明作者和出處。對于本網刊載作品涉及版權等問題的,請作者與本網站聯系,本網站核實確認后會盡快予以處理。

本網轉載之作品,并不意味著認同該作品的觀點或真實性。如其他媒體、網站或個人轉載使用,請與著作權人聯系,并自負法律責任。

3、本網站歡迎積極投稿

基隆| 阜阳| 黄冈| 迪庆| 兴安盟| 昌吉| 高雄| 黄山| 大庆| 五家渠| 昌吉| 绥化| 大庆| 青海西宁| 宜都| 锦州| 阜新| 项城| 武夷山| 洛阳| 三沙| 果洛| 邹城| 达州| 保山| 晋江| 漯河| 绍兴| 德宏| 任丘| 日喀则| 阿坝| 茂名| 金坛| 靖江| 义乌| 任丘| 巴彦淖尔市| 雅安| 晋江| 厦门| 六安| 锦州| 昭通| 铁岭| 慈溪| 德清| 丹东| 象山| 任丘| 燕郊| 昭通| 常德| 青海西宁| 大连| 哈密| 甘肃兰州| 济宁| 汉川| 宁波| 内蒙古呼和浩特| 江西南昌| 湛江| 晋江| 焦作| 镇江| 文山| 邢台| 随州| 赣州| 澄迈| 陕西西安| 果洛| 海西| 乌海| 那曲| 东莞| 霍邱| 延安| 安顺| 运城| 香港香港| 山东青岛| 广饶| 台南| 蚌埠| 诸城| 锦州| 巴音郭楞| 双鸭山| 基隆| 惠东| 盐城| 新疆乌鲁木齐| 张家界| 大兴安岭| 常州| 济南| 象山| 吐鲁番| 包头| 宜都| 许昌| 吕梁| 临汾| 巢湖| 阿克苏| 石嘴山| 如东| 眉山| 南平| 汉中| 威海| 澳门澳门| 文昌| 咸阳| 新泰| 雅安| 咸阳| 丹东| 云浮| 安阳| 攀枝花| 洛阳| 鄢陵| 亳州| 宜都| 阿拉尔| 定安| 杞县| 南京| 单县| 内蒙古呼和浩特| 海宁| 长治| 东台| 鸡西| 葫芦岛| 六安| 包头| 咸宁| 顺德| 丽江| 儋州| 仁寿| 四平| 垦利| 宜春| 燕郊| 湛江| 汕头| 吉林长春| 阿勒泰| 武安| 陵水| 阿里| 雅安| 深圳| 运城| 邯郸| 岳阳| 灌南| 日喀则| 衢州| 泸州| 崇左| 黑河| 邹城| 醴陵| 咸阳| 宁波| 仁怀| 塔城| 阿拉善盟| 徐州| 牡丹江| 鄂州| 东海| 博尔塔拉| 大兴安岭| 兴安盟| 开封| 荆门| 宝应县| 潜江| 桐城| 镇江| 广州| 毕节| 徐州| 潜江| 来宾| 海宁| 常州| 台湾台湾| 昌吉| 沧州| 通化| 辽宁沈阳| 海丰| 余姚| 龙岩| 朝阳| 那曲| 荣成| 巢湖| 温州| 果洛| 宜春| 十堰| 青海西宁| 滁州| 肇庆| 乌兰察布| 张掖| 曲靖| 营口| 中卫| 贺州| 云浮| 任丘| 哈密| 如皋| 山南| 石河子| 新余| 湘潭| 六安| 惠州| 甘南| 渭南| 汝州| 乌兰察布| 高雄| 曹县| 霍邱| 河源| 中卫| 绵阳| 邹平| 偃师| 三亚| 沭阳| 济南| 台湾台湾| 荣成| 宿迁| 怀化| 保定| 常德| 盘锦| 临汾| 任丘| 景德镇| 榆林| 滨州| 保定| 启东| 丽水| 定西| 林芝| 衡水| 甘孜| 神木| 新泰| 禹州| 绵阳| 天门| 迁安市| 乌兰察布| 滁州| 益阳| 如东| 通化| 果洛| 东台| 改则| 芜湖| 新沂| 临沂| 保定| 玉树| 十堰| 宜宾| 潍坊| 阿拉尔| 海东| 阳泉| 贺州| 黔南| 巴彦淖尔市| 宁德| 菏泽| 杞县| 商洛| 正定| 瓦房店| 马鞍山| 巴彦淖尔市| 平凉|